top of page

Graveyard of an Empire: The British limitations and incompetence in the Southern Theater of the Revolutionary War.

The American Revolutionary War famously started in the northern colony of Massachusetts, with the battles of Lexington and Concord when armed militia exchanged fire with British Regulars sent to confiscate the militia’s cache of weapons. The famous “shot heard around the world” had immediate severe consequences, as in less than 24 hours British held Boston was under siege by over 20,000 Massachusetts Militia. The British would withdraw from Boston and establish a new base of operations in New York from which to launch their offensives against the rebellious colonists. Unfortunately and surprisingly for the British, they would suffer a stunning defeat at the Battle of Saratoga in New York in 1777. With the Northern colonies securely in Patriot hands, the British now found themselves essentially with one real strategy left; the pacification of the southern colonies.

Throughout the Revolutionary War the British command greatly underestimated the Patriot forces and overestimated the support they would receive from the local population. It was popular belief that the loyalists in the colonies, especially the southern colonies, were numerous and that a few victories would encourage them to come out in full support of British troops. The British command recognized that the northern colonies were firmly in Patriot hands and the resentment towards the British was too great. Only excessive military force would pacify the north, especially Massachusetts. The British sought to completely block off the northern colonies from the southern ones and prevent them from collaborating in the war effort. A divide and conquer strategy was established; pacify the south then turn and face the north. To do this, the British marched out of New York City and Quebec into the interior of New York to rouse loyalist forces and catch the Patriot forces and destroy them. The British were unfortunately ill prepared and overestimated the loyalist support they would find. They also underestimated the value of the Patriot militias, which increased the size of the Patriot forces in the area. At the resulting Battle of Saratoga, the British Army of John Burgoyne was soundly defeated. The British strength in the middle colonies was greatly reduced and they turned their eyes toward the south.

Stanley Carpenter, author of British Strategic Failure in the Southern Campaign, 1778-81 states “the initial strategic concept called for retaking each colony in turn from south to north while establishing the conditions whereby local Loyalists could restore the Crown’s authority to civil government.” [1] The issue with the British strategy was that they greatly overestimated the amount of loyalist support they would find in the southern colonies. Not only was the support greatly limited, but the Patriot forces, including militia, that they faced were experts in hit and run tactics who knew the land better than the British could ever hope for.

Carpenter states that “The fundamental underpinning of the British Southern Strategy derived from the assumption that once offensive operations commenced, the heretofore suppressed Loyalists would turn out in great numbers.”[2] While there was indeed loyalist support in the southern colonies, it wasn’t enough to supplement the British forces as was hoped nor were they numerous or influential enough to hold on to areas captured by the British. The Loyalist Strategy became even more crucial with the entry of France into the war in 1778 and the opening of several fronts worldwide, requiring the British Regulars to be deployed elsewhere. This  made the failure of the Loyalist strategy even more devastating for the British strategy. This influenced Lord Cornwallis to adopt an aggressive offensive strategy in the South. Unfortunately, the British suffered some surprising defeats such as Huck’s Defeat at the Battle of Williamson’s Plantation, where an all-militia force defeated British regulars for the first time. The Battle of Williamson’s Plantation at first glance seems insignificant. It was a rather small battle, more of a skirmish. However, the impact of this battle for both sides was massive. For the Patriots, it showed that an all-Militia force could beat British regulars in open battle. With news spreading, Militias saw a big spike in volunteers signing up to fight the British. This also gave way to some rather prominent names in the irregular warfare fought in the South, namely Francis Marion.

The increase of the Southern Militias were devastating for the British cause. Still being despised and underestimated by the British, the militias caused mayhem in British supply lines and supplemented the Continental Regulars in the large open battles in the South such as Cowpens, Camden, and Guilford Courthouse. In these battles, the Militia played a big role. At Cowpens they composed a large number of troops in the front lines which saw victory over the Redcoats. Even in defeats such as Camden and Guilford Courthouse, the militia was used to fire on the British lines and inflict heavy casualties before retreating while mainly sparring the Continentals. This strategy employed by the Patriots severely weakened the British Army of Cornwallis who unable to defeat the South Carolina militia, and by default pacify the colony, opted to push northwards. His weakened and depleted army would find itself surrounded in Yorktown, Virginia by a combined French and Continental (including militia) force.

The British contributed greatly to their defeat in the American Revolutionary War. They underestimated the American forces time and again and greatly overestimated the amount of support they would find in the interior of the colonies. The Loyalist strategy of relying on the large flocking of Loyalists from the interior proved naïve. The support they found was nowhere near the amount expected nor enough. Finally, the British throughout the duration of the war underestimated and despised the militias, despite suffering greatly at their hands. In the end, the British defeat can be equally attributed to their own incompetence as well as American brilliance and determination.

 

Carpenter, Stanley D. M. British Strategic Failure in the Southern Campaign, 1778-81.

McCullough, David. Seventeen Seventy-Six. Simon and Schuster, 2006.


[1] Carpenter, Stanley D. M. British Strategic Failure in the Southern Campaign, 1778-81. Pg 9

[2] Carpenter, Stanley D. M. British Strategic Failure in the Southern Campaign, 1778-81. Pg 14

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page